MICROSOFT SURFACE PRO VS MACBOOK PRO 2017 PC
It’s a fairly recent game and came out for PC and consoles in 2013. Square Enix’s Tomb Raider is available on Steam on both platforms. Rather than rely on a synthetic game benchmark, I also decided to throw a real game at it. Surface Book also gets to wave good bye to the the MacBook Pro 13 in Unigine’s Heaven 4.0 Let’s try a real game Most of the tests showed the Surface Book with the same big performance margin, though I could also find settings that would drag down both laptop’s performance so they were the same. I opted for DirectX, as I don’t think it would have been fair to use OpenGL on the PC-Windows is all about DirectX, and it’s a big advantage for the platform.įull disclosure: I ran the same test with different settings to see how the graphics in both stacked up. On the Mac, the only graphics API is OpenGL, while the PC has DirectX and OpenGL. I did this because the MacBook Pro 13 defaulted to many of those settings when started. The test was run at 1366×768 resolution with 2x AA, no tessellation and medium quality. Next I ran Unigine’s Heaven 4.0 graphics test. The performance gap in the next test opens up that lead even more. As fast as Intel’s Iris 6100 is with its 48 execution units, it’s still not enough. That’s a pretty hefty performance advantage in OpenCL in the Surface Book’s win column. I ran it on both of the graphics chips which is where OpenCL should run. LuxMark 3 is a cross-platform OpenCL benchmark. I wasn’t sure how this one would break, as Intel’s OpenCL performance has come a long way, but the result is certainly something that’ll make PC fans happier. OpenCL stands for Open Compute Language, and it’s an attempt to move general purpose CPU chores onto the GPU.įor my test I ran the LuxBall load because other workloads crashed on the MacBook Pro 13.
It’s a test designed to measure the OpenCL performance of a chip. You can see what a difference it makes in GPU-intensive benchmarks.įirst up is LuxMark 3. Of the many ground-breaking features Microsoft pulled off with the Surface Book, one of the crowning achievements is that GPU under the keyboard. If you’re thinking Microsoft’s mouth was writing checks its hardware couldn’t cash, take a step back. Microsoft has never told me exactly what tests it used to determine the “twice” boost (believe me, I asked), but I always suspected it was mainly built around the GeForce chip. Given that disparity, Skylake still comes out looking pretty good. That’s a huge thermal and power difference. Skylake is a 15-watt chip going up against a 28-watt chip. I’d generally rule it a tie in CPU performance, though, and this is why. Let’s just agree that on the vast majority of CPU-bound tasks, the Core i5 MacBook Pro is probably going to be a smidge faster than the Core i5 Surface Book. I could show you a few more benchmark charts between these two platforms, but it won’t change unless I use something that might favor a new feature in the Skylake CPU, such as SpeedShift.
MICROSOFT SURFACE PRO VS MACBOOK PRO 2017 WINDOWS
Its rival was a Surface Book with an Intel Skylake Core i5-6300U, GeForce graphics, 8GB of RAM and PCIe SSD with Windows 10. So for the record, I tested a Retina MacBook Pro 13 with an Intel Broadwell Core i5-5752U, Iris 6100 graphics, 8GB of RAM and PCIe SSD, and the latest El Capitan build. I just plugged the Clipboard section with the Core i5 into the base with the graphics chip in it. Microsoft is still pretty secretive about the GPU in the Surface Books, but I don’t believe it’s putting a different GPU in the higher-end models.
Microsoft had also provided a Core i5 Surface Book without discrete graphics. That’s not a fair comparison, but I had a workaround. But t he only Surface Book I had with the discrete graphics chip had an Intel Core i7-6600U. How I testedįor my tests, I had access to a 2015 MacBook Pro 13. Microsoft even compares the two directly in its reviewers guide. So the target for the Surface Book is the MacBook Pro 13. It would be like Apple saying the MacBook Pro 15 outperforms, oh, an MSI GT 80 Titan SLI laptop in gaming. For Microsoft to say the Surface Book out performed the MacBook Pro 15 would be absurd. It’s larger, heavier, and packs a quad-core CPU and fairly beefy AMD discrete graphics. That’s a very important distinction, because the MacBook Pro 15 is a different class of laptop. The company specifically means the MacBook Pro 13 inch model. First, let’s clarify what Microsoft meant when it said the Surface Book would smoke the MacBook Pro.
0 kommentar(er)
